Re: [j-nsp] Hardware configuration for cRPD as RR

On 2/8/24 09:56, Saku Ytti via juniper-nsp wrote:

> Same concerns, I would just push it back and be a late adopter. Rock
> existing vRR while supported, not pre-empt into cRPD because vendor
> says that's the future. Let someone else work with the vendor to
> ensure feature parity and indeed perhaps get some appliance from the
> vendor.

Agreed.

> With HPE, I feel like there is a lot more incentive to sell integrated
> appliances to you than before.

Is the MX150 still a current product? My understanding is it's an x86 
platform running vMX.

Mark.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp