Re: [j-nsp] Hardware configuration for cRPD as RR
Saku Ytti via juniper-nsp <[email protected]> Sat, 10 Feb 2024 09:39:47 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.juniper |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAeewD_3UMEjxvsq46fA4KohoqAzOZxB_nj-VS+_-t3K442MTw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 17:50, Tom Beecher <[email protected]> wrote: > Completely fair, yes. My comments were mostly aimed at a vMX/cRPD comparison. I probably wasn't clear about that. Completely agree that it doesn't make much sense to move from an existing vRR to cRPD just because. For a greenfield thing I'd certainly lean cRPD over VRR at least in planning. Newer cRPD has definitely come a long way relative to older. ( Although I haven't had reason or cycles to really ride it hard and see where I can break it.... yet. :) ) Agreed on green field straight to cRPD today, and fallback to vRR if needed. Just because it is clear that vendor focus is there and wants to see you there. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp