Re: [j-nsp] BGP timer

On 4/29/24 17:42, Lee Starnes via juniper-nsp wrote:
> As for BFD and stability with aggressive settings, we don't run too
> aggressive on this, but certainly do require it because the physical links
> have not gone down in our cases when we have had issues, causing a larger
> delay in killing the routes for that path. Not being able to rely on link
> state failure leaves us with requiring the use of BFD.

Is this link carrying eBGP or iBGP?

If the latter, have you considered using BFD to track the IGP instead of 
BGP?

Mark.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp