Re: [j-nsp] Junos EVO RE Filters

On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 20:35, heasley <[email protected]> wrote:

> And enemy of security is lack of effort?  Current BMCs would be
> a step backward, imiho.  I wish they were better; a lot of
> potential..

What is the benchmark? Is benchmark NOS fate-sharing control-plane
ethernet? Or RS232? How do they outperform arbitrarily insecure BMC? I
wouldn't trust the BMC for security at any rate, the MGMT LAN would be
as closed as SSH to RS232, with 0 expectation that on the RS232 side
there is any security.

I don't think security is important at all here. I want to be able to
bring the box up quickly, when it dies, without sending people on the
field. I care much more about availability of service, than security
(and I don't think trade-off is being made here actually), because
availability you can measure, security mostly you can't, it's
astrology for men.

-- 
  ++ytti
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp