Re: [j-nsp] Doing SNAT only for destinations learned from a specific BGP peering

Emmanuel Halbwachs via juniper-nsp <[email protected]> Mon, 4 May 2026 14:52:26 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.network.nsp.juniper
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--===============8772336288954380148==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Sorry for the delay.

Thanks Alex, Tom and Martin. If I understand correctly, the summary is:

- MX204 does not support SNAT on interface (could have been the elegant configuration)
- MX204 does not support PAT at all
- SNAT is doable with routing instances
- PAT is doable by offloading the work to a Linux box
- SNAT + PAT is not doable elegantly on a sole MX204 box

And thanks Martin for the time you put in writing your thorough and
detailed example.

Have a nice day,

-- 
Emmanuel Halbwachs, Observatoire de Paris, ✆ +33 1 45 07 75 54
DIO¹ / CASTORS² 🦫 / PANDA³ 🐼
¹ Direction Informatique de l'Observatoire ; ² CAlcul, STOckage, Réseau, Système
³ Pool of Awesome Network Devices Administrators

--===============8772336288954380148==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KanVuaXBlci1u
c3AgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0IGp1bmlwZXItbnNwQHB1Y2submV0aGVyLm5ldApodHRwczovL3B1Y2su
bmV0aGVyLm5ldC9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2p1bmlwZXItbnNwCg==

--===============8772336288954380148==--