Re: [j-nsp] Doing SNAT only for destinations learned from a specific BGP peering
Emmanuel Halbwachs via juniper-nsp <[email protected]> Mon, 4 May 2026 14:52:26 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.nsp.juniper |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============8772336288954380148== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sorry for the delay. Thanks Alex, Tom and Martin. If I understand correctly, the summary is: - MX204 does not support SNAT on interface (could have been the elegant configuration) - MX204 does not support PAT at all - SNAT is doable with routing instances - PAT is doable by offloading the work to a Linux box - SNAT + PAT is not doable elegantly on a sole MX204 box And thanks Martin for the time you put in writing your thorough and detailed example. Have a nice day, -- Emmanuel Halbwachs, Observatoire de Paris, ✆ +33 1 45 07 75 54 DIO¹ / CASTORS² 🦫 / PANDA³ 🐼 ¹ Direction Informatique de l'Observatoire ; ² CAlcul, STOckage, Réseau, Système ³ Pool of Awesome Network Devices Administrators --===============8772336288954380148== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KanVuaXBlci1u c3AgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0IGp1bmlwZXItbnNwQHB1Y2submV0aGVyLm5ldApodHRwczovL3B1Y2su bmV0aGVyLm5ldC9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2p1bmlwZXItbnNwCg== --===============8772336288954380148==--