Re: Regarding the association class cim_memberofcollection

SNIA has seen multiple vendors passing CTP with Pegasus-based 
implementations using these classes.  My guess is either provider bugs 
or new (Experimental) profiles that have not yet been been verified in CTP.

On 3/21/2010 10:11 PM, Neeta.Sonawane wrote:
>
> Hello ,
>
> When the classes CIM_MemberofCollection and cim_Concretedependency are 
> enumerated , the instances returned do not macth the format CTP 1.4.0 
>  is expecting.
>
> The classes are implemented as per the SNIA SMI-S  specifications.
>
> Is this a bug with CTP or has any body faced simmilar kind of problem 
> with these classes with CTP 1.4.0 ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Neeta
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
>
> This e-mail message may contain proprietary, confidential or legally 
> privileged information for the sole use of the person or entity to 
> whom this message was originally addressed. Any review, e-transmission 
> dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon 
> this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error 
> kindly delete this e-mail from your records. If it appears that this 
> mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, please notify 
> us immediately at [email protected] and delete this mail.
> _____________________________________________________________________