Re: Queries regarding Indications behaviour.
Ashok K Pathak <[email protected]> Wed, 7 Nov 2012 17:11:04 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.open-pegasus.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF8F356F16.EAED607F-ON65257AAF.003FBDD1-65257AAF.00402ED3@in.ibm.com> |
For question 2 I think you can look the defect 9013(Indications arrives
out-of-order from provider to handler. ) which is part of already released
2.12 version which seems to address the issue
Regards
Ashok
"Karunanithy,
Karthik"
<KarthikPachaiapp To
an.Karunanithy@ne "[email protected]"
tapp.com> <[email protected]>
cc
07-11-2012 16:40 "Subbaiah, Kamalalochana"
<[email protected]>
Subject
Queries regarding Indications
behaviour.
Hi ,
We have some queries related to the functionality of
indications in Open Pegasus. It would be great if someone can confirm on
these behaviors.
1. Cimserver shutdown fails with pending Indication delivery –
Indications were subscribed. Indication listener was shut down. Stop
the cimserver. Cimserver does not shut down.
2. Out of order indication delivery – Indication subscription
was created for ClassA followed by indication subscription to ClassB.
Two life cycle indications were generated(IndicationA for instance
Class A followed by IndicationB for instance of Class B).
IndicationB(indication for class B) was delivered followed by
delivery of IndicationA (indication for class A). The expected
behavior is IndicationA delivered first and then IndicationB. We
suspect that indication thread created for indicationB finding the
subscription earlier in the list when compared to subscription for
class A causing it to deliver the indication out of order.
Regards
Karthik