Re: Queries regarding Indications behaviour.
Marek Szermutzky <[email protected]> Thu, 8 Nov 2012 09:54:13 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.open-pegasus.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OFF4DA11DE.991FE6FC-ONC1257AB0.003123B3-C1257AB0.00316524@de.ibm.com> |
As Ashok wrote, the "Out of order" indication delivery was fixed in OP 2.12 and using the released version should not exhibit out of order delivery. Regarding number 1, that is not expected behavior. If OP behaves that way it definitely is a Bug. Can you reproduce using OP 2.12 ? We have fixed quite a number of things for indications in that release. Kind regards, Marek Szermutzky Software Engineer / OpenPegasus Maintainer (PMC) and z/OS PlatformRep. IBM Systems &Technology Group, Systems Software Development / z/OS Capacity Management and Support ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IBM Deutschland Schoenaicher Str. 220 71032 Boeblingen Phone: +49-7031-16-5182 E-Mail: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH / Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294 From: Ashok K Pathak <[email protected]> To: "Karunanithy, Karthik" <[email protected]> Cc: "Subbaiah, Kamalalochana" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: 07.11.2012 12:42 Subject: Re: Queries regarding Indications behaviour. ---------- For question 2 I think you can look the defect 9013(Indications arrives out-of-order from provider to handler. ) which is part of already released 2.12 version which seems to address the issue Regards Ashok "Karunanithy, Karthik" <KarthikPachaiapp To an.Karunanithy@ne "[email protected]" tapp.com> <[email protected]> cc 07-11-2012 16:40 "Subbaiah, Kamalalochana" <[email protected]> Subject Queries regarding Indications behaviour. Hi , We have some queries related to the functionality of indications in Open Pegasus. It would be great if someone can confirm on these behaviors. 1. Cimserver shutdown fails with pending Indication delivery – Indications were subscribed. Indication listener was shut down. Stop the cimserver. Cimserver does not shut down. 2. Out of order indication delivery – Indication subscription was created for ClassA followed by indication subscription to ClassB. Two life cycle indications were generated(IndicationA for instance Class A followed by IndicationB for instance of Class B). IndicationB(indication for class B) was delivered followed by delivery of IndicationA (indication for class A). The expected behavior is IndicationA delivered first and then IndicationB. We suspect that indication thread created for indicationB finding the subscription earlier in the list when compared to subscription for class A causing it to deliver the indication out of order. Regards Karthik