Re: New adopter questions

CIM-RS is still in work in progress,
http://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/files/standards/documents/DSP0210_1.0.0a.pdfthe
doc expired on 28th Feb.

On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Devchandra L Meetei <[email protected]>wrote:

> This will depend on the availability of CIM-RS protocol in
> public(personally I dont know, will check soon the status), We would
> certainly be interested to take this further.
> I will be pushing the topic in our next architecture call, You may join
> the call, I will update the the details of call which is on Thursday and We
> will discuss,
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Anuj Jain <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Devchandra!
>>
>> That clears up quite a bit.
>>
>> I look at the combination of CIM-RS and a simple webserver in Pegasus as
>> a huge advantage.
>> With traditional, heavy UIs (Java Applet/Application), a CIMClient was
>> fine with no need for a webserver. But with modern implementation of the
>> UIs with HTML5/Ajax, REST & JSON seems to be the path ahead. Today, such an
>> implementation needs Pegasus for your object model and then an external
>> (external to Pegasus) webserver to pull information from the CIMOM and
>> translate it into JSON for your UI. This external webserver additionally
>> serves up html/css/js and mime content.
>> This combination of CIM-RS (or its likes) with Pegasus's ability to be a
>> simple webserver serving html/css/js pages along with some mime content
>> would eliminate the need of an external webserver.
>> Consider this my request for the webserver feature :-)
>> The obvious next question is, how can we drive this initiative further?
>>
>> Thanks again!
>> Anuj
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Devchandra L Meetei <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> This view is soley my understanding and does not represent the view of
>>> pegasus community.
>>> Yes, PEP #362 was not implemented as the DSP was not public yet, It was
>>> work in progress. Once it becomes public, I am inclined to believe that it
>>> will be implemented, Many users are interested.
>>>
>>> Aah, Regarding the webadmin interface again, Should it a part of 2.13?
>>> Community is discussing, We have
>>> http://bugzilla.openpegasus.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9219 which has most of
>>> the implementation, But we may require some tweaking.
>>> Should a user request it, community will certainly try hard to push in
>>> 2.13.
>>> --
>>> Warm Regards
>>> --Dev
>>> OpenPegasus Developer
>>> "It's Always better to try and fail instead of not doing/trying anything"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Anuj Jain <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I am not so new to Pegasus but its been a while since I have been
>>>> involved with it. Last I was involved with Pegasus was 2008 and the
>>>> community and the product have come a long way!
>>>>
>>>> I am researching Pegasus's features for adopting it as a CIMOM. I have
>>>> a couple of questions.
>>>>
>>>> - CIM-RS (JSON) support: After browsing through a lot of documentation
>>>> on the Open Pegasus site, I see mentions of CIM-RS implementation. The
>>>> ManDevCon presentation has some reference to it. I also found PEP # 362.
>>>> But I do not see any traces of the implementation. Is this implemented
>>>> (even if partially) in a separate branch?
>>>>
>>>> - Web Admin to the CIMOM: Again, looking through the site, I came
>>>> across mentions of something that to me seemed like a web interface to the
>>>> CIMOM (only for CIMOM admin). Is there something like this present in
>>>> Pegasus? If so, can someone please point me to some documentation/help of
>>>> enabling this feature.
>>>>
>>>> Your help is greatly appreciated.
>>>> Thank you
>>>> Anuj
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Warm Regards
> --Dev
> OpenPegasus Developer
> "It's Always better to try and fail instead of not doing/trying anything"
>



-- 
Warm Regards
--Dev
OpenPegasus Developer
"It's Always better to try and fail instead of not doing/trying anything"