Re: pcache LDAP_MATCHING_RULE_IN_CHAIN support

--nextPart1907522.DqgEXMOCkK
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; protected-headers="v1"
From: Johan <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: pcache LDAP_MATCHING_RULE_IN_CHAIN support
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 10:08:57 +0100
Message-ID: <2493567.Y3PuRShkce@titan>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <13739788.Ye7WBYhGKV@titan> <[email protected]>

Le vendredi 10 f=E9vrier 2023, 11:38:02 CET Howard Chu a =E9crit :
> > P.S.: Is there a reason mr_passthru is not included to OpenLDAP ? not e=
ven
> > in contrib ?
>=20
> Since no one has contributed it upstream, I have no idea what you're talk=
ing
> about. Ask whoever wrote whatever it is.
>=20

https://github.com/cbueche/openldap-passthru
I found this thread which seem to be the genesis : https://openldap.org/lis=
ts/
openldap-technical/201406/msg00004.html

The OP made an attempt to see it included here https://www.openldap.org/lis=
ts/
openldap-technical/201411/msg00123.html, so I would like to renew this call=
=20
for inclusion upstream.

Thank you for your help, which made me realize I need to read more for the=
=20
pcache patch!


--nextPart1907522.DqgEXMOCkK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEENZi/iukIcfmANy3+ASt1nrkxHusFAmPwlakACgkQASt1nrkx
HuuNtgf/e2PVLZYyrTsgqfuxClkUpud+CPG9ZW6C8EWo0HZs4ZLM7pRsHGqQuhC+
hE9/dsT7tGCtowzq/NApbqi/7YPY0vxNxVW2hwTWk8hMM2fDXhTo4d0EgP8XGYEq
ACSinVmsJ6ecIBSEwwx8sw2DJ9roJAqokmtswlBIpBIgY6tbv64Huitt4Q463zVy
GDFfjclWtNBuwb+Qqgb+5zCVf+XybyPibvw27BlPBKTkGvTFoKgKTMSZeoeQJY6m
dpFtVgF74nfVMEiMGoZg+NRgHjNjVVT3Nju9ssqOb5tPDP6wV0SC1LYvZI1LlLN6
JAFfK/iV7G8X5zNSR8wDHbGfVCDTIg==
=cwTc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1907522.DqgEXMOCkK--