Re: libldap vs libldap_r ?
Ryan Tandy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.openldap.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 05:31:34PM +0000, Howard Chu wrote: >I would probably keep "libldap" as the canonical name. ++ >We can completely drop the "libldap_r" name or just keep it as a >symlink for a while, removing it after a year or so. I'd maybe make that "after a release or so" i.e. if "libldap" becomes canonical starting from 2.5, don't drop the symlink at least until 2.6.