Re: ITS#8286 continued
Howard Chu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.openldap.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> I found a few stray items that still need matching rules. All were trivially straight forward except one for slapo-chain:
>
> { "chain-chaining", "args",
> 2, 4, 0, ARG_MAGIC|ARG_BERVAL|CH_CHAINING, chain_cf_gen,
> "( OLcfgOvAt:3.1 NAME 'olcChainingBehavior' "
> "DESC 'Chaining behavior control parameters (draft-sermersheim-ldap-chaining)' "
> "SYNTAX OMsDirectoryString SINGLE-VALUE )", NULL, NULL },
>
> At the moment, based on the man page description, I was thinking:
>
> "EQUALITY caseExactMatch "
>
> for the matching rule. Anyone have an opinion for caseIgnoreMatch being better?
Looks like the values are schema keywords, they should be caseIgnoreMatch.
>
> Thanks,
> Quanah
>
>
> --
>
> Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Product Architect
> Symas Corporation
> Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP:
> <http://www.symas.com>
>
>
>
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/