Re: TLS renotiation

Howard Chu <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.openldap.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
> I've now posted my preliminary report on the general impact of TLS  
> renegotiation on LDAP to the [email protected] list, for initial  
> discussion there.  A final report will be made available later, likely  
> posted to [email protected].
> 
> This message is available in our local archive of this list: http://www.openldap.org/lists/ietf-ldapext/200911/msg00000.html
> 
> Howard has already made a brief statement here regarding impact upon  
> OpenLDAP Software on this list.  In short summary, only the "milder  
> issue" applies to OpenLDAP Software (and seems to a very minor  
> concern).  Clients can mitigate this issue as discussed in the  
> report.  Servers can mitigate this issue by disabling TLS  
> renegotiations within their TLS library.  Disabling TLS renegotiations  
> in the server has side effects which might not be desirable in certain  
> deployments.

OpenSSL 0.8.9l was quickly released in response to this attack. It is supposed
to disable TLS renegotiation support, but it has a number of bugs. Instead of
cleanly closing the session when a reneg occurs, it hangs. I suggest that
people hold off another couple days before deploying a TLS reneg fix. At least
for OpenLDAP, since in this case the cure is worse than the actual problem.

http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.openssl.dev/browse_thread/thread/4c36ff4db820e37c#

-- 
  -- Howard Chu
  CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.