Re: Will slapadd work with delta-syncrepl?

--On Friday, March 26, 2010 8:43 PM -0400 Khoa Nguyen 
<[email protected]> wrote:


> Now, my colleague doesn't agree with me on the delta-syncrepl approach,
> and prefers to update A and B independently. His argument is that with
> delta-syncrepl, B is dependent on A, so if A's databases (main + log) are
> corrupted, and we have to restore A to a previous checkpoint, B would
> automatically rollback, and we would lost the latest data. I still prefer
> delta-syncrepl approach, since if updated independently, A and B can be
> out-of-synch over time and we wouldn't know it.


If A corrupts, then you slapcat B and reload A with the data.

--Quanah

--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration