Re: [opennic-discuss] Discord?
Sebastian Makowiecki <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.opennic.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The key word is 'open', any kind of closed environment 'should be' out of the question. ~ Sebastian Makowiecki On Mon, 9 Jul, 2018 at 8:28 PM, kevin <[email protected]> wrote: > See, THIS makes much more sense. > > I have a tech I made that uses MQTT. I can pass all message traffic > in > what ever way I want, including transparently. If I want to pass > traffic to an IRC channel, I could pass things by way of email, social > media, or some custom chat software. It makes sense to investigate a > way that all public conversations use some similar type of open > technology to pass info between communications channels as an > aggregator or bridge between communication channels. > > This type of methodology of communication distribution and > disbursement > can be set up as a distributed system so no single host can control > conversation, yet shared filters can be implemented to kill spam or > assign roles of "authority" such as moderators. > > That's something I could investigate. > > Kevin > > On Mon, 2018-07-09 at 14:50 -0400, Daniel Quintiliani wrote: >> There is one thing which might be bad about using Discord only. >> Discord allows the main admin (Jonah) to delete others' messages, >> and >> the main admin can create "roles" and assign them abilities, >> including to edit and delete messages. >> >> I run my own publicly-listed Discord, and when your Discord is >> publicly listed in directories you're bound to attract spammers, >> usually you set up a bot (like Sweetiebot) to assign spammers the >> "silence" role and then I or others in the "staff" role can delete >> the messages. >> >> Additionally, you often have spammers spam you with PMs, and then >> when you report it to the Discord they're in, they deny it and >> delete >> the spam PM. >> >> So Fusl might be right about having everything official done on IRC, >> and considering a bridge as I investigated (Jonah suggested it might >> be best to have a separate Discord channel for the bridge) >> >> -- >> >> -Dan Q >> >> >> On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 14:09:29 -0400 (EDT), "Daniel Quintiliani" >> <danq@ >> runbox.com> wrote: >> >> > >> > There are bots which enable communication between Discord and IRC. >> > None of us are familiar with them yet though, and Fusl said she >> > wanted to keep the Discord hidden from anything official. But it's >> > worth looking at. >> > >> > https://github.com/reactiflux/discord-irc >> > >> > -- >> > >> > -Dan Q >> > >> > >> > On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 01:17:16 -0500, kevin <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > More bandwidth does not make for more clear conversation. I >> > > specifically still use text only email for reasons that make >> > > perfect >> > > sense to me and are most effective for me. I DO NOT want HTML >> > > and >> > > other crap in my email and I DO NOT like animated graphics in my >> > > social >> > > media feeds. >> > > >> > >> > -------- >> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. >> > You may unsubscribe by emailing >> [email protected] >> > oject.org >> >> >> -------- >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. >> You may unsubscribe by emailing >> [email protected] >> ect.org > > > -------- > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. > You may unsubscribe by emailing > [email protected] -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]