Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] 1 year wait before re-voting
"Daniel Quintiliani" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.opennic.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I've heard that said about UDRP, actually. If you lose, adjust something a little and start over. To Jonah, you suggested in the past revisiting votes you lost on, and are doing that now with Discourse and Discord. To the person I forget who who was unhappy about .front being voted out, he wanted to vote again (nothing came of it, possibly it was just complaining) And as for myself, I did the same thing for .free/.libre, and we held a vote for a "nonbinding suggestion" that the TLD owner rejected anyway. It's just good to have a fixed time limit of some sort on this issue, to keep things stable and ensure integrity of the organization, just like how we voted on your proposals for voting procedures. I think it should be more long-term than short-term, but others here disagree. -- -Dan Q On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 23:27:05 -0500, Jonah Aragon <[email protected]> wrote: > Seeing as I was called out specifically in the initial post, I figured I should chime in. Adding such a time limit just seems arbitrary to me. I’ll be voting for no change to the current system, barring some extraordinary argument. Is there any precedent for such a system in other democratic setups? > > Jonah > > > On Jul 9, 2018, at 9:05 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Would probably be best instead of a yes/no to do something like: > > > > * 1 year > > * 8 months > > * 6 months > > * Less than 6 months, determined by a separate proposal > > * No changes. > > > > If "less than 6 months" is chosen, we can do a separate proposal with > > > > * 3 months > > * 1 months > > * No changes. > > > > If "no changes" wins in either case, proposals such as this cannot be revisited for 6 months after the votes are counted. > > > > Would you agree that this is a better way? > > > > -- > > > > -Dan Q > > > > > >> On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 22:09:30 +0100, Sebastian Makowiecki <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Was thinking 6-8 months. Eight seems fair. > >> > >> ~ > >> Sebastian Makowiecki > >> > >> On Mon, 9 Jul, 2018 at 10:03 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> 6 months? > >>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> -Dan Q > >>> > >>> On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 21:52:12 +0100, Sebastian Makowiecki > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> The idea is good, one year to much, 3 months to little, in my > >>>> opinion > >>>> that is for what is worth. > >>>> > >>>> ~ > >>>> Sebastian Makowiecki > >>>> > >>>>> On Mon, 9 Jul, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Rouben <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> 1 year might be a bit too much... perhaps 1-3 months? > >>>>> > >>>>> Rouben > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:29 PM Daniel Quintiliani > >>>> <[email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> There has been a problem of people trying to hold new votes too > >>>>>> recently after their proposals lose. This includes Jonah's > >>>> proposals > >>>>>> to replace IRC with Discord and Sympa with Discourse, and someone > >>>>>> who lost I think the .front TLD, and I did so myself with the > >>>>>> .free/.libre thing. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I propose there be a one year (365 day) waiting period before > >>>> anyone > >>>>>> can bring proposals back up for a new vote. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What do you think? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -Dan Q > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -------- > >>>>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. > >>>>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -------- > >>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. > >>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing > >>>> [email protected] > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -------- > >>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. > >>> You may unsubscribe by emailing > >>> [email protected] > >> > >> > >> -------- > >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. > >> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > -------- > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. > > You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected] > > > -------- > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. > You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected] -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]