Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] TLD Reliability Policies

Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> While I can't say anything about the specifics of this, as I don't run any TLDs, you might want to take into account the current volatile nature of Github, by specifically stating that members can vote to move things to other sites in the event of a problem. We shouldn't try and predict the finances and (mis)management of Github, but instead change these proposals to specifically state that members can vote to move hosting to other places.
>   

Git was designed for repositories to be widely mirrored, so I suggest 
replacing "GitHub" with "public Git hosting services" and keeping a list 
of multiple official OpenNIC Git mirrors.

Also, there should be a procedure for returning archived TLDs to active 
status if an operator steps forward.

-- Jacob



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]