Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] Clarification of voting rules

I would question the methodology used in these cases, but yes, we have 
to be pragmatic so I would only want to alter the rules 
for***upcoming*proposals.

albino

On 21/07/18 01:17, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> If you wish to do this, this would apply to FUTURE proposals...otherwise several past votes
> are illegitimate (such as .libre/.free)
>
> --
>
> -Dan Q
>
>
> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 01:15:38 +0100, Al Beano <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Recent events suggest that we should clarify a set of voting rules.
>>
>> My view is that all proposals submitted to the ML (or DokuWiki as the
>> case may be) should be subject so a simple yes/no vote, and pass with a
>> majority over 50%. A tie would result in the status quo being preserved.
>> No other options would be allowed.
>>
>> This system means that all proposals that pass have the full support of
>> the majority of voters. Proposals with more complex implementation
>> details (e.g. the current one re "Reintroduction of past proposals") can
>> be formed however the person writing them wants - including by gathering
>> the thoughts of members using the ML or other means - but they bear no
>> weight until ratified by a simple majority of members.
>>
>> albino
>>
>>
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
>
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]