Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] Clarification of voting rules
"Daniel Quintiliani" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.opennic.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Over 50% i think is already in place, we decided that a while ago when we voted on Jonah's proposals. I support your idea of "a tie would result in the status quo being preserved." but forcing yea/nay for every situation is inefficient and long. (I mentioned choosing a replacement for .free as one of those situations.) Perhaps yea/nay should be assumed in all cases unless the voting process is described in the proposal. -- -Dan Q On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 01:23:02 +0100, Al Beano <[email protected]> wrote: > I would question the methodology used in these cases, but yes, we have > to be pragmatic so I would only want to alter the rules > for***upcoming*proposals. > > albino > > On 21/07/18 01:17, Daniel Quintiliani wrote: > > If you wish to do this, this would apply to FUTURE proposals...otherwise several past votes > > are illegitimate (such as .libre/.free) > > > > -- > > > > -Dan Q > > > > > > On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 01:15:38 +0100, Al Beano <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Recent events suggest that we should clarify a set of voting rules. > >> > >> My view is that all proposals submitted to the ML (or DokuWiki as the > >> case may be) should be subject so a simple yes/no vote, and pass with a > >> majority over 50%. A tie would result in the status quo being preserved. > >> No other options would be allowed. > >> > >> This system means that all proposals that pass have the full support of > >> the majority of voters. Proposals with more complex implementation > >> details (e.g. the current one re "Reintroduction of past proposals") can > >> be formed however the person writing them wants - including by gathering > >> the thoughts of members using the ML or other means - but they bear no > >> weight until ratified by a simple majority of members. > >> > >> albino > >> > >> > >> -------- > >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. > >> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > -------- > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. > > You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected] > > > -------- > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. > You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected] -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]