Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] Clarification of voting rules
Jonah Aragon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.opennic.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Can you elaborate on why instant-runoff voting isn’t an acceptable alternative for multiple choice proposals? Jonah > On Jul 20, 2018, at 7:15 PM, Al Beano <[email protected]> wrote: > > Recent events suggest that we should clarify a set of voting rules. > > My view is that all proposals submitted to the ML (or DokuWiki as the case may be) should be subject so a simple yes/no vote, and pass with a majority over 50%. A tie would result in the status quo being preserved. No other options would be allowed. > > This system means that all proposals that pass have the full support of the majority of voters. Proposals with more complex implementation details (e.g. the current one re "Reintroduction of past proposals") can be formed however the person writing them wants - including by gathering the thoughts of members using the ML or other means - but they bear no weight until ratified by a simple majority of members. > > albino > > > -------- > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. > You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected] -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]