Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals

Ignore this post, spoke to Jonah and he clarified things for me.

--

-Dan Q


On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 21:01:54 -0400 (EDT), "Daniel Quintiliani" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Meaning if there were options A-H, and the surviving options for the second round were A-D and H, but B did not show up in the first place results despite getting votes, would we repeat the A-D+H round again or move on to A,C,D,H? 
> 
> --
> 
> -Dan Q
> 
> 
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 20:58:57 -0400 (EDT), "Daniel Quintiliani" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > A question though - do we really need to repeat votes in the case that Option A has 2 votes and Option B has 1 vote if none of them made first place during that round? If so, January would be a better choice than February for the policy to go into effect. 
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > -Dan Q
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 20:53:42 -0400 (EDT), "Daniel Quintiliani" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > I think so too. There was another person who didn't vote but mentioned they didn't think it was fair. So if every round consists of 8 "no changes" and 3 rotating remaining other choices, the consistent "no changes" votes will still win in the end. But I do agree with some other users that this is a more fair way to have done the vote.
> > > 
> > > --
> > > 
> > > -Dan Q
> > > 
> > > On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 19:36:49 -0500, Jonah Aragon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > For what it’s worth, it doesn’t look like instant-runoff voting would have affected the results whatsoever, since “no” had over 50% of the *total* votes. Unless perhaps some “no” voters only voted that way due to peer pressure and truly wanted to vote for a less popular choice? Seems unlikely though. 
> > > > 
> > > > Just saying, when you reintroduce this, don’t expect drastically different results, based on this evidence. 
> > > > 
> > > > Jonah
> > > > 
> > > > > On Jul 20, 2018, at 7:12 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Vote results:
> > > > > 
> > > > > B (9 months):
> > > > > 
> > > > > Daniel Quintiliani
> > > > > 
> > > > > D (3 months):
> > > > > 
> > > > > Jacob Bachmeyer
> > > > > Mikhail Elias
> > > > > 
> > > > > E (1 month):
> > > > > 
> > > > > Ole Juul (vvande)
> > > > > Rouben
> > > > > 
> > > > > F (I vote against this change in policy.):
> > > > > 
> > > > > Jonah Aragon
> > > > > Grant Baron
> > > > > Christopher
> > > > > Fusl
> > > > > Jon Hebb
> > > > > Megan Parat
> > > > > Jack Ternan
> > > > > 
> > > > > No votes for A or C.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Protest/invalid:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Sebastian Makowiecki
> > > > > Philipp Schafft
> > > > > Al Beano
> > > > > 
> > > > > --
> > > > > 
> > > > > As no changes in policy have been made, per discussion on Discord and comments
> > > > > on the mailing list, I will reintroduce the proposal with instant runoff voting.
> > > > > Discussion thread to come.
> > > > > 
> > > > > --
> > > > > 
> > > > > -Dan Q
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 20:05:47 -0400 (EDT), "Daniel Quintiliani" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Beginning: July 14, 2018, 00:00 UTC
> > > > >> Ending: July 21, 2018, 00:00 UTC
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Original discussion thread (note: the title does not reflect the proposal, as different ideas were proposed during discussion): https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-07/msg00024.html
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> -----
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Previously failed proposals to create OpenNIC TLDs, and all identical duplicates of proposals which have failed to pass, shall not be introduced for another:
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> (A) 12 months
> > > > >> (B) 9 months
> > > > >> (C) 6 months
> > > > >> (D) 3 months
> > > > >> (E) 1 month
> > > > >> (F) I vote against this change in policy.
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> This proposal, if passed, shall take effect on September 1, 2018, at 00:00 UTC.
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> -----
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> My vote is for B (9 months).
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> -Dan Q
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> --------
> > > > >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> > > > >> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --------
> > > > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> > > > > You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --------
> > > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> > > > You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --------
> > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> > > You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
> > 
> > 
> > --------
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]