Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals
Amunak <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.opennic.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I would personally vote for such proposal if I felt like the vote was fair. But I abstained because it was clear that in the current vote format it could not rerally win. Also I'm slightly opposed to adding more rules that would just add buerocracy without much other effect, but that's another thing. On 21.07.2018 2:36, Jonah Aragon wrote: > For what it’s worth, it doesn’t look like instant-runoff voting would have affected the results whatsoever, since “no” had over 50% of the *total* votes. Unless perhaps some “no” voters only voted that way due to peer pressure and truly wanted to vote for a less popular choice? Seems unlikely though. > > Just saying, when you reintroduce this, don’t expect drastically different results, based on this evidence. > > Jonah > >> On Jul 20, 2018, at 7:12 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Vote results: >> >> B (9 months): >> >> Daniel Quintiliani >> >> D (3 months): >> >> Jacob Bachmeyer >> Mikhail Elias >> >> E (1 month): >> >> Ole Juul (vvande) >> Rouben >> >> F (I vote against this change in policy.): >> >> Jonah Aragon >> Grant Baron >> Christopher >> Fusl >> Jon Hebb >> Megan Parat >> Jack Ternan >> >> No votes for A or C. >> >> Protest/invalid: >> >> Sebastian Makowiecki >> Philipp Schafft >> Al Beano >> >> -- >> >> As no changes in policy have been made, per discussion on Discord and comments >> on the mailing list, I will reintroduce the proposal with instant runoff voting. >> Discussion thread to come. >> >> -- >> >> -Dan Q >> >> >>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 20:05:47 -0400 (EDT), "Daniel Quintiliani" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Beginning: July 14, 2018, 00:00 UTC >>> Ending: July 21, 2018, 00:00 UTC >>> >>> Original discussion thread (note: the title does not reflect the proposal, as different ideas were proposed during discussion): https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-07/msg00024.html >>> >>> ----- >>> >>> Previously failed proposals to create OpenNIC TLDs, and all identical duplicates of proposals which have failed to pass, shall not be introduced for another: >>> >>> (A) 12 months >>> (B) 9 months >>> (C) 6 months >>> (D) 3 months >>> (E) 1 month >>> (F) I vote against this change in policy. >>> >>> This proposal, if passed, shall take effect on September 1, 2018, at 00:00 UTC. >>> >>> ----- >>> >>> My vote is for B (9 months). >>> >>> -- >>> >>> -Dan Q >>> >>> >>> -------- >>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. >>> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected] >> >> >> >> -------- >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. >> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected] >> >> >> >> -------- >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. >> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected] -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]