[opennic-discuss] [opinion] Corporate strategies yields corporate results

kevin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.opennic.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I've just been thinking about a problem with another community I'm
involved in and while working through possible solutions, I remembered
that corporate strategies yields corporate results.

As an original group of volunteerists, it's odd to look at the way
openNIC has progressed in some areas, especially for a group that I
believe wanted to get away from the bureaucracy that resulted in ICANN.

I'm not opposed to voting for things as a way to maintain focus on
certain activities that will move a community forward, but when a vote
is about developing a bureaucratic and corporate structure, it really
doesn't make sense for a group of decentralized volunteerists.  In
fact, it can be highly detrimental to such a group activity.  A lot of
some of the more current "decisions" the group has voted on and the
direction of much of our documentation, especially as "rules" rather
than "guidelines", I wonder what the end result of openNIC might be, in
relation to ICANN.

Anyhow, I just wanted to put that out there and find if maybe there's
others active in the group who are thinking like I am, or if I'm really
just an outlier in the community.

Kevin



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.