[opennic-discuss] [opinion] Corporate strategies yields corporate results
kevin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.opennic.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I've just been thinking about a problem with another community I'm involved in and while working through possible solutions, I remembered that corporate strategies yields corporate results. As an original group of volunteerists, it's odd to look at the way openNIC has progressed in some areas, especially for a group that I believe wanted to get away from the bureaucracy that resulted in ICANN. I'm not opposed to voting for things as a way to maintain focus on certain activities that will move a community forward, but when a vote is about developing a bureaucratic and corporate structure, it really doesn't make sense for a group of decentralized volunteerists. In fact, it can be highly detrimental to such a group activity. A lot of some of the more current "decisions" the group has voted on and the direction of much of our documentation, especially as "rules" rather than "guidelines", I wonder what the end result of openNIC might be, in relation to ICANN. Anyhow, I just wanted to put that out there and find if maybe there's others active in the group who are thinking like I am, or if I'm really just an outlier in the community. Kevin -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]