Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1

Per the proposal, there are several rounds, with the last place option being eliminated in each round, until the last round which consists of two options and one winner.

https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-07/msg00126.html

I'm not revising the proposal a third time. If people still don't think the results are fair, they can come up with something else (which not being the same exact proposal would be unaffected by this).

--

-Dan Q


On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 20:17:09 -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]> wrote:

> To further clarify:  I support "F, G, H, E, D, I" in that order. I do 
> not support the other options at all, which is the reason that I 
> originally padded out the set with "I".
> 
> Perhaps I misunderstand "instant run-off", but I have the impression 
> that I give one set of votes in order of preference, and the votes will 
> be tallied with no further input from me.  Are we doing both instant 
> run-off and *actual* run-off votes after the instant run-off vote?
> 
> -- Jacob
> 
> Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> > Let me put it a better way. "I vote, but my votes only count if I win" is not a valid vote.
> >
> > --
> >
> > -Dan Q
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 22:59:35 -0400 (EDT), "Daniel Quintiliani" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> You can't abstain and vote at the same time. It will be recorded as "F, G, H, E, D, I" for the first round unless you change it or remove your votes before the deadline.
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> -Dan Q
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 21:45:55 -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>     
> >>> Then I will clarify:  F, G, H, E, D, I and I abstain if all of those are 
> >>> eliminated.
> >>>
> >>> -- Jacob
> >>>
> >>> Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> >>>       
> >>>> A reminder: "Vote up to 9 times in order of preference. In each round, an option may be chosen only once, and only the options given below are valid." So "I" only counts once, with your vote: "F, G, H, E, D, I" 
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>> -Dan Q
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 20:41:06 -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>   
> >>>>         
> >>>>> Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>           
> >>>>>> [...]
> >>>>>> Previously failed proposals to create OpenNIC TLDs, and all identical duplicates of proposals which have failed to pass, shall not be introduced for another:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> (A) 12 months
> >>>>>> (B) 9 months
> >>>>>> (C) 8 months
> >>>>>> (D) 6 months
> >>>>>> (E) 4 months
> >>>>>> (F) 3 months
> >>>>>> (G) 1 month
> >>>>>> (H) 1 week
> >>>>>> (I) I vote against this change in policy.
> >>>>>>   
> >>>>>>       
> >>>>>>             
> >>>>> I vote:  F, G, H, E, D, I, I, I, I.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -- Jacob
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --------
> >>>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> >>>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>           
> >>>>   
> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --------
> >>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> >>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
> >>>>   
> >>>>         
> >>> --------
> >>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> >>> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
> >>>       
> >> --------
> >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> >> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
> >>     
> >
> >
> >   
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > --------
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
> >   
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]