Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] Invalidate previous vote; eliminate other forms of voting

Jonah Aragon <[email protected]> Mon, 30 Jul 2018 23:24:10 -0500
Newsgroups	gmane.network.opennic.general
Message-ID	<[email protected]>
Yes you’re correct. I didn’t realize those settings were set like that on my phone, since they’re fixed to just my name on my laptop. Katie (Fusl) set that (including the core team string) as my name on the email server, but that will be resolved.

Jonah

> On Jul 30, 2018, at 11:18 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Then perhaps you shouldn't refer to yourself as "OpenNIC Core Team" in emails.
> 
> https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-07/msg00172.html
> 
> --
> 
> -Dan Q
> 
> 
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 23:17:13 -0500, Jonah Aragon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Note that nobody here is using this phrase. That being said, there most certainly is [although I would make no claim to be a part of it at this current moment]. It’s even in the original OpenNIC charter and policies.
>> 
>> Jonah
>> 
>>> On Jul 30, 2018, at 11:10 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Moreover, there is no such thing as an "OpenNIC Core Team" - this is the first time anyone has used this phrase.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> -Dan Q
>>> 
>>> On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:08:07 -0400 (EDT), "Daniel Quintiliani" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Bullshit. The exact language of the proposal is given here:
>>>> 
>>>> https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-07/msg00126.html
>>>> 
>>>> I am sick and tired of you thinking who the fuck you are. You have no more authority than the rest of us. If you wish to go ahead with your proposal, you must follow the 7-day rule which you yourself wrote and we approved.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> 
>>>> -Dan Q
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 23:05:03 -0500, Jonah Aragon, OpenNIC Core Team <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I would like to invalidate the results of Daniel Q’s previous vote, which was counted in a manner inconsistent with normal “instant runoff voting” procedure. As he won’t permit a sane recount by other community members including myself, the vote and all future related votes being conducted with the same voting procedure should be considered misleading and invalid.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Furthermore, I’d like to mandate that all votes in the future should be a simple “Aye/Yes” vs “Nay/No” style of voting, to avoid any such confusion again.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This proposal will be voted on as soon as legally permissible.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jonah
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --------
>>>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>>>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --------
>>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --------
>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)