Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] Invalidate previous vote; eliminate other forms of voting

Jonah Aragon <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.opennic.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
It’s fixed now, thanks. Although debatably it isn’t far from reality, and the core team without a doubt exists.

Jonah

> On Jul 30, 2018, at 11:27 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I have no objection to you acting in accordance with policies. Personally the only reason I did this was because *other* people were complaining, and I thought I'd take advantage of it due to my vote on the original. But "Jonah Aragon, OpenNIC Core Team" is trolling at best and deceitful at worst.
> 
> --
> 
> -Dan Q
> 
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 23:15:41 -0500, Jonah Aragon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Obviously this proposal will proceed in accordance with existing policies.
>> 
>> Jonah
>> 
>>> On Jul 30, 2018, at 11:08 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Bullshit. The exact language of the proposal is given here:
>>> 
>>> https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-07/msg00126.html
>>> 
>>> I am sick and tired of you thinking who the fuck you are. You have no more authority than the rest of us. If you wish to go ahead with your proposal, you must follow the 7-day rule which you yourself wrote and we approved.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> -Dan Q
>>> 
>>> On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 23:05:03 -0500, Jonah Aragon, OpenNIC Core Team <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>> I would like to invalidate the results of Daniel Q’s previous vote, which was counted in a manner inconsistent with normal “instant runoff voting” procedure. As he won’t permit a sane recount by other community members including myself, the vote and all future related votes being conducted with the same voting procedure should be considered misleading and invalid.
>>>> 
>>>> Furthermore, I’d like to mandate that all votes in the future should be a simple “Aye/Yes” vs “Nay/No” style of voting, to avoid any such confusion again.
>>>> 
>>>> This proposal will be voted on as soon as legally permissible.
>>>> 
>>>> Jonah
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --------
>>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --------
>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=soJ7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.