Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1

Good morning,

On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 00:01 -0400, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> Without getting into the vote counting issues again,

As things seem to be unclear, IF this should be democratic there is only
one option: declare the voting invalid and schedule a new one with the
rules set out clear.

Everything else would break the democratic at this point.

As this is a formal error and the options to vote on MUST stay EXACTLY
the same there is no reason to implement a delay between the votes
longer than what is necessary to ensure voters aren't confused of the
process. e.g. one to two weeks.


> if it will stop Jonah from his dunce cap troll proposal, or encourage
> him to write something professional which does not personally attack
> me, accuse me of engaging in unethical and fraudulent activity, and
> mention me by name, I'd be happy to do a yea/nay. The only reason I
> did a second proposal was because *other* people thought it was
> unfair. This is exactly what I was trying to stop. This proposal is
> really not worth it to me, and had I known it would cause all this
> trouble, I would have told one of the unhappy people to write it
> themselves.

You're now doing it again, getting personal against someone who
criticized you. As per your own "PROPOSAL" you're not allowed to do
this. It's hard for people to not consider your values, your being, and
your actions if you can not stand up to the your own standards. Even
more if you try to enforce them against others by a policy change.


I'm looking forward to your reply in wich you will declare this invalid
and ask for *opinions* on when to reschedule this for. I'm also looking
forward to read your next call for vote on the same topic.

With best regards,

-- 
Philipp.
 (Rah of PH2)



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]