[opennic-discuss] Thoughts on Code of Conduct (and lack thereof)

Rouben <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.opennic.general
Message-ID <CAGShw4=i9F2PFMpBjGk1DhUKRT_baM41zfw00cNPX0WAoHvpwg@mail.gmail.com>
After trying to keep up with the recent threads and votes around what is,
essentially, conduct, I kept thinking: why doesn’t OpenNIC have a code of
conduct? IMO rather than introduce reactive policy proposals, wouldn’t it
be best to have a code of conduct instead, and perhaps even a formal
statement of purpose?

Here’s a few examples from high profile open source projects:
https://www.ubuntu.com/community/code-of-conduct
https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Code_of_conduct
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council/Code_of_conduct

I rather like the Ubuntu one, because it is an example of an organization
with a relatively mature governance structure.

The Arch code of conduct is probably the most practical with lots of
details on a number of etiquette points, like quoting posts and bumping old
threads.

Gentoo’s is an example of a “short and to the point” style, with pretty
much two sections: acceptable and unacceptable behaviours.

Just thinking out loud here...

Rouben

-- 
Rouben



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.