[opennic-discuss] Thoughts on Code of Conduct (and lack thereof)
Rouben <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.opennic.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGShw4=i9F2PFMpBjGk1DhUKRT_baM41zfw00cNPX0WAoHvpwg@mail.gmail.com> |
After trying to keep up with the recent threads and votes around what is, essentially, conduct, I kept thinking: why doesn’t OpenNIC have a code of conduct? IMO rather than introduce reactive policy proposals, wouldn’t it be best to have a code of conduct instead, and perhaps even a formal statement of purpose? Here’s a few examples from high profile open source projects: https://www.ubuntu.com/community/code-of-conduct https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Code_of_conduct https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council/Code_of_conduct I rather like the Ubuntu one, because it is an example of an organization with a relatively mature governance structure. The Arch code of conduct is probably the most practical with lots of details on a number of etiquette points, like quoting posts and bumping old threads. Gentoo’s is an example of a “short and to the point” style, with pretty much two sections: acceptable and unacceptable behaviours. Just thinking out loud here... Rouben -- Rouben -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]