Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] Opinions and allegations in proposals
Megan Parat <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.opennic.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree with Amunak and also vote "No". On 08/09/2018 08:25 PM, Amunak wrote: > > While I don't necessarily disagree with the idea that our proposals > and such should be free of criticisms of members and allegations, I > don't think we need to add more (mostly meaningless) buerocracy and > rules to the process. I also see this as a reactionary and maybe even > "in protest" proposal, and find that childish and stupid. > > Therefore I vote "no", against this proposal. > > > On 2018-08-09 02:28, Daniel Quintiliani wrote: >> Voting starts: 8/9/2018 0030 UTC >> Voting ends: 8/16/2018 0030 UTC >> >> OpenNIC proposals shall not contain, in full or in part, language which: >> >> * Praises an OpenNIC member on basis of their character or actions, >> * Condemns an OpenNIC member on basis of their character or actions, >> * Makes allegations of unethical or illegal activity by an OpenNIC member, unless confirmed by a court of law, and/or >> * Criticizes or comments on a proposal or vote, past or present, whether passed or failed, in which an OpenNIC member is criticized on basis of their character or actions. >> >> The proposal shall take effect immediately after passing. >> >> These rules are only applicable to proposals put up for vote, not to mailing list or IRC discussion. >> >> -- >> >> -Dan Q >> >> >> -------- >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. >> You may unsubscribe by [email protected] > > > > > -------- > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. > You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected] -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]