Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] Opinions and allegations in proposals

I vote "No".


On 08/09/2018 05:50 PM, Megan Parat wrote:
>
> I agree with Amunak and also vote "No".
>
>
> On 08/09/2018 08:25 PM, Amunak wrote:
>>
>> While I don't necessarily disagree with the idea that our proposals 
>> and such should be free of criticisms of members and allegations, I 
>> don't think we need to add more (mostly meaningless) buerocracy and 
>> rules to the process. I also see this as a reactionary and maybe even 
>> "in protest" proposal, and find that childish and stupid.
>>
>> Therefore I vote "no", against this proposal.
>>
>>
>> On 2018-08-09 02:28, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
>>> Voting starts: 8/9/2018 0030 UTC
>>> Voting ends: 8/16/2018 0030 UTC
>>>
>>> OpenNIC proposals shall not contain, in full or in part, language which:
>>>
>>> * Praises an OpenNIC member on basis of their character or actions,
>>> * Condemns an OpenNIC member on basis of their character or actions,
>>> * Makes allegations of unethical or illegal activity by an OpenNIC member, unless confirmed by a court of law, and/or
>>> * Criticizes or comments on a proposal or vote, past or present, whether passed or failed, in which an OpenNIC member is criticized on basis of their character or actions.
>>>
>>> The proposal shall take effect immediately after passing.
>>>
>>> These rules are only applicable to proposals put up for vote, not to mailing list or IRC discussion.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> -Dan Q
>>>
>>>
>>> --------
>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>>> You may unsubscribe by [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> You may unsubscribe by [email protected]
>
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]