Re: [opennic-discuss] Another idea: quorum

I'm not certain there is any formal, legal, corporate entity nor
governance in play with openNIC.

I am not certain if any formal laws would apply regarding openNIC nor
any formal voting procedures which may or may not exist, especially due
to the global nature of this informal group.

Once all the voting is out of the systems of those who are imposing all
these "votes" on this informal group of people participating in
openNIC, I do not believe there are any authorities, other than those
who's server resources are being used.  I suspect only those people who
have volunteered their resources will have any type of authority
regarding any voting that has occurred in the past and only regarding
their specific resources, time, or effort that they will continue to
volunteer.

Kevin

On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 22:12 -0400, Rouben wrote:
> Hi again,
> 
> I have another idea/question: do OpenNIC elections require any kind
> of
> quorum? In other words, if a proposal is made and only 3 people
> bother to
> vote (total), is the vote valid, or is there a certain minimum number
> of
> voters/votes required to consider the vote valid (i.e. quorum)?
> 
> Just a thought/question...
> 
> Rouben
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]
> ect.org



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]