Re: [opennic-discuss] [RECOUNT] Opinions and allegations in proposals

You really think I was being dishonest when I went out of my way, copying and pasting German and Polish paragraphs that I didn't understand and with letters not on my keyboard, just because I used the word "write-in" instead of "invalid", given the results are exactly the same, everything is listed as it is, and everything is and has been fully audited by these same people, to the exact same results?

--

-Dan Q

On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 00:28:23 -0700, <[email protected]> wrote:

> An example of a vote that is not a "write-in"
> would be if someone voted both yes and no.
> Or, in the case of a paper ballot, didn't mark
> anything at all.
> 
> ~ Ole
> 
> 
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 03:03:35 -0400 (EDT)
> "Daniel Quintiliani" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > "What does you make sure that things you haven't heard
> > about don't exist?"
> > 
> > OK, if you believe this to be the case, please give me an
> > example of an "invalid" vote which is not a "write in"
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > -Dan Q
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 07:00:38 +0000, Philipp Schafft
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > Good morning,
> > > 
> > > On Thu, 2018-08-16 at 02:44 -0400, Daniel Quintiliani
> > > wrote:  
> > > > What the hell do you want of me? Everything is listed
> > > > and counted, and displayed below. I have never heard
> > > > of an "invalid" vote which was not a "write in".  
> > > 
> > > What does you make sure that things you haven't heard
> > > about don't exist? 
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]