Re: [opennic-discuss] REMOVE THIS EMAIL ADDRESS

Niles Rogoff <[email protected]> Sat, 25 Aug 2018 22:15:02 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.network.opennic.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The bottom of every email on this list contains instructions on removing
yourself from the list

On 8/25/18 10:13 PM, Mead Rose wrote:
> please please please remove this email from your list
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 5:50 PM Philipp Schafft <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Good afternoon,
>>
>> On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 15:27 -0400, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
>>> Al Beano changed his vote to No as did Sebastian.
>>>
>>> 2018-08/msg00234.html
>>> 2018-08/msg00235.html
>>>
>>> 2018-08/msg00131.html
>>> 2018-08/msg00217.html
>> Thank you for sharing perfectly useless references.
>> If you try to provide a link, provide all of it.
>>
>>
>>> Never before in the history of OpenNIC have changing your votes
>> considered invalid.
>>
>> There always has been discussion. Search the archive for it!
>>
>>
>>> Stop being an asshole and causing trouble.
>> Yes, here are are again: hate, fear, disrespect. The only thing you
>> actually add to OpenNIC.
>>
>> While you were having your war on the this list people like Jeff and
>> Fusl and I have actually improved stuff. I openly invited you to help.
>>
>> Why not join us and help OpenNIC as well? DOING ACTUAL WORK.
>>
>> But I make a guess here:
>> You will not respond to this part of my E-Mail. As you have not
>> responded to any of my E-Mails that invited you to join as a friend and
>> help OpenNIC to become better.
>>
>> All you do is having your wars here on the list. Wars that add a lot of
>> stress and work to all of us. Doing actual work? No, that's for others.
>>
>>
>> Prove me wrong! Do actual work!
>>
>>
>> With best regards,
>>
>>
>>> On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 13:11:14 +0000, Philipp Schafft <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Good afternoon,
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 20:53 -0400, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
>>>>> Yes (6):
>>>>>
>>>>> Daniel Quintiliani
>>>>> Jonah Aragon
>>>>> Allen Schultz
>>>>> Dennis Emory Hannon
>>>>> Jacob Bachmeyer
>>>>> Vladimir F.
>>>>>
>>>>> No (7):
>>>>>
>>>>> Amunak
>>>>> Megan Parat
>>>>> Jack Ternan
>>>>> Sebastian Makowiecki*
>>>>> vv
>>>>> kevin
>>>>> Al Beano*
>>>>>
>>>>> Invalid votes:
>>>>>
>>>>> Philipp Schafft ("democracy")
>>>>>
>>>>> * changed from invalid vote
>>>>>
>>>>> Proposal failed to pass, 6-7
>>>> I can not second this counting as I come to a different counting.
>>>>
>>>> I count as following:
>>>>
>>>> Yes:
>>>>       * Vladimir F. <[email protected]> in
>>>>         <[email protected]>
>>>>       * Allen Schultz <[email protected]> in <CAP+RUJfu
>>>>         [email protected]>
>>>>       * Dennis Emory Hannon <[email protected]> in
>>>>         <[email protected]>
>>>>       * Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]> in
>>>>         <[email protected]>
>>>>       * Jonah Aragon <[email protected]> in
>>>>         <[email protected]>
>>>>       * Daniel Quintiliani <[email protected]> in
>>>>         <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> No:
>>>>       * Amunak <[email protected]> in
>>>>         <[email protected]>
>>>>       * Megan Parat <[email protected]> in
>>>>         <[email protected]>
>>>>       * Jack Ternan <[email protected]> in
>>>>
>>  <trinity-42ea374d-b4f4-49c3-b0ee-10010f652460-1534647456998@3c-app-mailcom-lxa13
>>>>       * [email protected] in <20180819005723.09dd06b1@SCO>
>>>>       * kevin <[email protected]> in
>>>>         <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> Spoilt:
>>>>       * Philipp Schafft <[email protected]> in
>>>>         <[email protected]>
>>>>       * Al Beano <[email protected]> in
>>>>         <[email protected]>
>>>>       * Al Beano <[email protected]> in
>>>>         <[email protected]> (invalid
>> as
>>>>         double voted)
>>>>       * Sebastian Makowiecki <[email protected]> in
>>>>         <[email protected]>
>>>>       * Sebastian Makowiecki <[email protected]> in
>>>>         <[email protected]> (invalid as
>>>>         double voted)
>>>>
>>>> Total counts:
>>>> Yes: 6; No: 5; Spoilt: 3; TOTAL: 14
>>>>
>>>> Relative counts:
>>>> Yes: 6/14 = ~42.86%; No: 5/14 = ~35.71%; Spoilt: 3/14 = ~21.43%
>>>>
>>>> Therefore:
>>>> Yes wins with highest number of votes.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I ask someone to step up and do a 3rd counting.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> With best regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 20:41:29 -0400 (EDT), "Daniel Quintiliani" <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> Voting starts: 8/15/2018 0040 UTC
>>>>>> Voting ends 8/22/2018 0040 UTC
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. All OpenNIC proposals put up for vote shall be in the English
>> language.
>>>>>> 2. All votes for OpenNIC proposals shall be in the English
>> language, and votes which are not in English shall be considered invalid.
>>>>>> These rules are only applicable to proposals put up for vote, and
>> to the votes themselves. These rules are not applicable to discussions on
>> the mailing list or on IRC.
>>>>>> The proposal shall take effect immediately after passing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This vote shall be done in "Aye/Yes" and "Nay/No" style. Only
>> English language votes shall be accepted.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Philipp.
>>  (Rah of PH2)
>>
>>
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>> [email protected]
>>
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]

-- 
Niles Rogoff
https://niles.xyz
https://linkedin.com/in/nilesrogoff
Key: B78B 908F 2343 0F80



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]