Re: [opennic-discuss] Vote to keep or drop peering with NameCoin

Amunak <[email protected]> Sun, 30 Jun 2019 12:05:37 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.network.opennic.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1561889143-3952-48
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------FB713EBECA37C57FEB2EEA7E"
Content-Language: en-US

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------FB713EBECA37C57FEB2EEA7E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Why? The T2 server list is capable of displaying and filtering pretty 
much anything. Some T2 server providers may choose to run more 
blacklists, some may choose to run none. That's their decision and as 
long as they say so in their server's description then more power to 
everyone - the whole point of sharing T2 servers is to provide a service 
to other users who have an interest in that service *with that 
particular configuration*. Same goes for logging and such.

Sure, don't show it on the homepage among "recommended servers" but 
there's no reason to essentially blacklist those servers and operators 
from OpenNic.

Amunak

On 30.06.2019 1:55, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> Jeff Taylor wrote:
>> It could relate to any domains, opennic or icann.  And I'm not saying 
>> we WILL, I'm just saying we COULD have that option.  Like with the 
>> spamhaus listings, use of this would be up to the individual T2 
>> operators.  At the moment there is nothing planned, I just wrote the 
>> API so we could expand on its use later if we chose to.
>
> I suggest a policy restricting the use of non-malware blacklists to 
> private T2 servers.  In other words, T2 servers using blacklists for 
> any category other than malware would not be eligible to be listed in 
> the public directory.
>
> We might even want to require public T2 servers to blacklist known 
> malware domains, but that is sure to be highly controversial. Should 
> we censor ransomware?
>
>
> -- Jacob
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]

--------------FB713EBECA37C57FEB2EEA7E
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Why? The T2 server list is capable of displaying and filtering
      pretty much anything. Some T2 server providers may choose to run
      more blacklists, some may choose to run none. That's their
      decision and as long as they say so in their server's description
      then more power to everyone - the whole point of sharing T2
      servers is to provide a service to other users who have an
      interest in that service *with that particular configuration*.
      Same goes for logging and such.</p>
    <p>Sure, don't show it on the homepage among "recommended servers"
      but there's no reason to essentially blacklist those servers and
      operators from OpenNic.</p>
    <p>Amunak</p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 30.06.2019 1:55, Jacob Bachmeyer
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:[email protected]">Jeff
      Taylor wrote:
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite">It could relate to any domains, opennic or
        icann.  And I'm not saying we WILL, I'm just saying we COULD
        have that option.  Like with the spamhaus listings, use of this
        would be up to the individual T2 operators.  At the moment there
        is nothing planned, I just wrote the API so we could expand on
        its use later if we chose to.
        <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      I suggest a policy restricting the use of non-malware blacklists
      to private T2 servers.  In other words, T2 servers using
      blacklists for any category other than malware would not be
      eligible to be listed in the public directory.
      <br>
      <br>
      We might even want to require public T2 servers to blacklist known
      malware domains, but that is sure to be highly controversial.
      Should we censor ransomware?
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      -- Jacob
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">

--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>

--------------FB713EBECA37C57FEB2EEA7E--

------------=_1561889143-3952-48
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]

------------=_1561889143-3952-48--