Re: [opennic-discuss] Vote to keep or drop peering with NameCoin
"Daniel Quintiliani" <[email protected]> Sun, 30 Jun 2019 20:17:47 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.opennic.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1561940269-3952-53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Even in countries which mandate net neutrality? -- -Dan Q On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 17:07:51 -0700, <[email protected]> wrote: > I think you're wrong about that. A quick google and > you'll see that DNS filtering is actually quite common. >=20 > ~ Ole >=20 >=20 > On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 18:56:32 -0400 (EDT) > "Daniel Quintiliani" <[email protected]> wrote: >=20 > > No ISP in the free world does this with their DNS > > servers. Why should we? > >=20 > > -- > >=20 > > -Dan Q > >=20 > >=20 > > On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 15:58:11 -0500, kevin > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >=20 > > > The problem here was, spamhaus painted ALL opennic > > > peers with a broad brush. So those that won't filter > > > anything, which I fully support, could potentially > > > affect everyone. > > >=20 > > > As many, if not most of us here appear to believe, this > > > project has always been about freedom with > > > collaboration via a touch of democracy (voting) thrown > > > in. And I believe that everyone can (and will) do as > > > they please. > > >=20 > > > But... and so to repeat, those that filter nothing > > > (including malware) could affect all of us. And like > > > the .free domain, I don't care and would have preferred > > > to keep it under openNIC. But, not everyone agrees > > > with what I think. lol So filtering, at least for > > > malware, certainly could be suggested as a strong > > > guideline or recommendation. And my opinion with > > > anything else, obviously leave that to the individual > > > T2 hosts. > > >=20 > > > Kevin > > >=20 > > > On Sun, 2019-06-30 at 12:05 +0200, Amunak wrote:=20=20 > > > > Why? The T2 server list is capable of displaying and > > > > filtering pretty=20 > > > > much anything. Some T2 server providers may choose to > > > > run more blacklists, some may choose to run none. > > > > That's their decision and as=20 > > > > long as they say so in their server's description > > > > then more power to everyone - the whole point of > > > > sharing T2 servers is to provide a service=20 > > > > to other users who have an interest in that service > > > > *with that particular configuration*. Same goes for > > > > logging and such. > > > >=20 > > > > Sure, don't show it on the homepage among > > > > "recommended servers" but there's no reason to > > > > essentially blacklist those servers and operators=20 > > > > from OpenNic. > > > >=20 > > > > Amunak > > > >=20 > > > > On 30.06.2019 1:55, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:=20=20 > > > > > Jeff Taylor wrote:=20=20 > > > > > > It could relate to any domains, opennic or > > > > > > icann. And I'm not saying=20 > > > > > > we WILL, I'm just saying we COULD have that > > > > > > option. Like with the=20 > > > > > > spamhaus listings, use of this would be up to the > > > > > > individual T2 operators. At the moment there is > > > > > > nothing planned, I just wrote the=20 > > > > > > API so we could expand on its use later if we > > > > > > chose to.=20=20 > > > > >=20 > > > > > I suggest a policy restricting the use of > > > > > non-malware blacklists to=20 > > > > > private T2 servers. In other words, T2 servers > > > > > using blacklists for=20 > > > > > any category other than malware would not be > > > > > eligible to be listed in=20 > > > > > the public directory. > > > > >=20 > > > > > We might even want to require public T2 servers to > > > > > blacklist known malware domains, but that is sure > > > > > to be highly controversial. Should=20 > > > > > we censor ransomware? > > > > >=20 > > > > >=20 > > > > > -- Jacob > > > > >=20 > > > > >=20 > > > > >=20 > > > > > -------- > > > > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. > > > > > You may unsubscribe by emailing=20 > > > > > [email protected]=20=20 > > > >=20 > > > > -------- > > > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.=20 > > > > You may unsubscribe by emailing=20 > > > > [email protected]=20=20 > > > --=20 > > > http://ca.linkedin.com/in/kevinrattai/ > > >=20 > > > https://winnipegcryptoconference.com/ > > >=20 > > > https://github.com/krattai > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > -------- > > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.=20 > > > You may unsubscribe by emailing > > > [email protected]=20=20 > >=20 > >=20 >=20 >=20 > -------- > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.=20 > You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected].= org ------------=_1561940269-3952-53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected] ------------=_1561940269-3952-53--