Re: [opennic-discuss] Vote to keep or drop peering with NameCoin

"Daniel Quintiliani" <[email protected]> Sun, 30 Jun 2019 20:17:47 -0400 (EDT)
Newsgroups gmane.network.opennic.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1561940269-3952-53
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Even in countries which mandate net neutrality?

--

-Dan Q


On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 17:07:51 -0700, <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think you're wrong about that. A quick google and
> you'll see that DNS filtering is actually quite common.
>=20
> ~ Ole
>=20
>=20
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 18:56:32 -0400 (EDT)
> "Daniel Quintiliani" <[email protected]> wrote:
>=20
> > No ISP in the free world does this with their DNS
> > servers. Why should we?
> >=20
> > --
> >=20
> > -Dan Q
> >=20
> >=20
> > On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 15:58:11 -0500, kevin
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >=20
> > > The problem here was, spamhaus painted ALL opennic
> > > peers with a broad brush.  So those that won't filter
> > > anything, which I fully support, could potentially
> > > affect everyone.
> > >=20
> > > As many, if not most of us here appear to believe, this
> > > project has always been about freedom with
> > > collaboration via a touch of democracy (voting) thrown
> > > in. And I believe that everyone can (and will) do as
> > > they please.
> > >=20
> > > But...  and so to repeat, those that filter nothing
> > > (including malware) could affect all of us.  And like
> > > the .free domain, I don't care and would have preferred
> > > to keep it under openNIC.  But, not everyone agrees
> > > with what I think. lol  So filtering, at least for
> > > malware, certainly could be suggested as a strong
> > > guideline or recommendation. And my opinion with
> > > anything else, obviously leave that to the individual
> > > T2 hosts.
> > >=20
> > > Kevin
> > >=20
> > > On Sun, 2019-06-30 at 12:05 +0200, Amunak wrote:=20=20
> > > > Why? The T2 server list is capable of displaying and
> > > > filtering pretty=20
> > > > much anything. Some T2 server providers may choose to
> > > > run more blacklists, some may choose to run none.
> > > > That's their decision and as=20
> > > > long as they say so in their server's description
> > > > then more power to everyone - the whole point of
> > > > sharing T2 servers is to provide a service=20
> > > > to other users who have an interest in that service
> > > > *with that particular configuration*. Same goes for
> > > > logging and such.
> > > >=20
> > > > Sure, don't show it on the homepage among
> > > > "recommended servers" but there's no reason to
> > > > essentially blacklist those servers and operators=20
> > > > from OpenNic.
> > > >=20
> > > > Amunak
> > > >=20
> > > > On 30.06.2019 1:55, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:=20=20
> > > > > Jeff Taylor wrote:=20=20
> > > > > > It could relate to any domains, opennic or
> > > > > > icann.  And I'm not saying=20
> > > > > > we WILL, I'm just saying we COULD have that
> > > > > > option.  Like with the=20
> > > > > > spamhaus listings, use of this would be up to the
> > > > > > individual T2 operators.  At the moment there is
> > > > > > nothing planned, I just wrote the=20
> > > > > > API so we could expand on its use later if we
> > > > > > chose to.=20=20
> > > > >=20
> > > > > I suggest a policy restricting the use of
> > > > > non-malware blacklists to=20
> > > > > private T2 servers.  In other words, T2 servers
> > > > > using blacklists for=20
> > > > > any category other than malware would not be
> > > > > eligible to be listed in=20
> > > > > the public directory.
> > > > >=20
> > > > > We might even want to require public T2 servers to
> > > > > blacklist known malware domains, but that is sure
> > > > > to be highly controversial. Should=20
> > > > > we censor ransomware?
> > > > >=20
> > > > >=20
> > > > > -- Jacob
> > > > >=20
> > > > >=20
> > > > >=20
> > > > > --------
> > > > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > > > > You may unsubscribe by emailing=20
> > > > > [email protected]=20=20
> > > >=20
> > > > --------
> > > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.=20
> > > > You may unsubscribe by emailing=20
> > > > [email protected]=20=20
> > > --=20
> > > http://ca.linkedin.com/in/kevinrattai/
> > >=20
> > > https://winnipegcryptoconference.com/
> > >=20
> > > https://github.com/krattai
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > --------
> > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.=20
> > > You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > > [email protected]=20=20
> >=20
> >=20
>=20
>=20
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.=20
> You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected].=
org



------------=_1561940269-3952-53
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing [email protected]

------------=_1561940269-3952-53--