Re: [opennms-devel] Bug#: 2235
Jeff Gehlbach <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.opennms.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Feb 4, 2008, at 7:36 AM, Mike M wrote: > I think this would be cool, especially since we occasionally see nodes > kernel panic and reboot faster than OpenNMS can catch them. My only > concern is that sysuptime is not exactly reliable, especially for > high-uptime Linux machines which have the jiffies rollover problem > after 497 days. Alejandro Galue wrote a sysUpTime tracker at Dev-Jam 2007 that does exactly what Rabie suggested. I believe he checked it in to trunk during bug day this past weekend. sysUpTime sucks for a number of reasons, but we can't count on having hrSystemUptime everywhere, and it's the best indicator we've got of a device or agent having been restarted that's not configured to send coldStart traps. I think most people would be willing to accept an extra rescan every sixteen months in exchange for not missing an index shift. - -jeff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkenHxoACgkQB3953+hexDozuACeNvQrBmrFVLuxQzKM2C5eDpNf snYAn0e6HIoRzbEIYBnZ1zlMH2ce90gD =6uji -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ: http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ opennms-devel mailing list To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel