Re: [opennms-devel] Bug#: 2235
Alejandro Galue <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.opennms.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, Thanks for catch it. It fixed on rev 8336 Alejandro. On Feb 4, 2008, at 2:59 PM, Rabie Van der Merwe wrote: > Hi, > > I see bug 2235 is fixed, just a note, nothing big, there is a typo in > the debug output attached to the bug: > > "Ignoring value because of sysUpTime chaned" > Should read: > "Ignoring value because of sysUpTime changed" :) > > Regards > Rabie > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Rabie > Van der Merwe > Sent: 04 February 2008 17:50 PM > To: OpenNMS Code Development and Bugs > Subject: Re: [opennms-devel] Bug#: 2235 > > Mmm I have seen the uptime issue on some older boxes here ... > On a side note I run a threshold check on sysUptime to catch any > system > restarts that falls between the 5 min ping checks :) > > Rabie > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Mike M > Sent: 04 February 2008 14:37 PM > To: OpenNMS Code Development and Bugs > Subject: Re: [opennms-devel] Bug#: 2235 > > On Feb 4, 2008 6:43 AM, Rabie Van der Merwe <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Just a thought, but it might not be a bad idea to extent on this a >> little >> and trigger a rescan of a node if it picks up that the sysuptime has >> reset, >> that way if anything moved because of a reboot we would catch it? >> (think cisco :) ) > > I think this would be cool, especially since we occasionally see nodes > kernel panic and reboot faster than OpenNMS can catch them. My only > concern is that sysuptime is not exactly reliable, especially for > high-uptime Linux machines which have the jiffies rollover problem > after 497 days. > > Mike > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > - > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ: > http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ > > opennms-devel mailing list > > To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom > of > this page: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > - > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ: > http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ > > opennms-devel mailing list > > To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom > of > this page: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ: > http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ > > opennms-devel mailing list > > To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom > of this page: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ: http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ opennms-devel mailing list To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel