[opennms-devel] comments on the ONMS contributor's agreement OCA

Bobby Krupczak <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.opennms.bugs
Message-ID <20080617175830.GA20229__28208.2349215218$1213725591$gmane$org@uncasville.krupczak.org>
Hi!

> Today we announced the OpenNMS Contributor Agreement (OCA). I've  
> blogged about it here:
> 
> http://blogs.opennms.org/?p=227
> 
> I'm interested in any feedback those on this developers list have.

Funny you should ask and what timing!

I *just* got back from a meeting with my attorney to go over licensing
of my own code, my own open source plans, and my contribution to the
ONMS project.  The agreement looks fine.

The only real issue that came up with the ONMS contributor's agreement
is the joint ownership clause.  In effect, that section allows ONMS to
do a RedHat and have a Fedora version and a RHEL version.  I'm OK with
that for my current contribution.  However, for future contributions,
I will have to take this into account as I'm sure all developers
should.

So, I would like to submit my XMP collector and my mods to various
config files to use it.  I'll sign the agreement and send it to you.

Thanks,

Bobby


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ:
http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ

opennms-devel mailing list

To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this page:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.