[OpenNMS/opennms] d0abef: NMS-20027: treat NaN as equal in the strategy comp...
Marshall Massengill via opennms-cvs <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:46:57 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.opennms.cvs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OpenNMS/opennms/push/refs/heads/mm/NMS-20027-smoke/[email protected]> |
Branch: refs/heads/mm/NMS-20027-smoke
Home: https://github.com/OpenNMS/opennms
Commit: d0abefcd00f8a85da239d10ea32a2af19a4d9eda
https://github.com/OpenNMS/opennms/commit/d0abefcd00f8a85da239d10ea32a2af19a4d9eda
Author: Marshall Massengill <[email protected]>
Date: 2026-07-23 (Thu, 23 Jul 2026)
Changed paths:
M features/flows/itests/src/test/java/org/opennms/netmgt/flows/elastic/ProportionalSumStrategyComparisonIT.java
Log Message:
-----------
NMS-20027: treat NaN as equal in the strategy comparison
Empty series buckets are filled with Double.NaN, and both strategies
produce NaN in the same cells, but Hamcrest closeTo never matches NaN so
the aligned comparison failed on empty buckets even though the drift and
Painless results agree. Compare NaN cells as equal and keep the tolerance
check for real values.
To unsubscribe from these emails, change your notification settings at https://github.com/OpenNMS/opennms/settings/notifications
_______________________________________________
Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ:
http://www.opennms.org/wiki/index.php?page=MailingListFaq
opennms-cvs mailing list
To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this page:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-cvs