Re: Considering shipping ssh-keysign non-setuid
"Theo de Raadt" <[email protected]> Fri, 15 May 2026 07:53:33 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.openssh.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm pretty sure that would be a mistake. The problem is not ssh-keysign. It is a kernel bug. It affects any setuid program and it is my understanding that a typical Linux ships with almost a hundred of those. It is also my understanding that this bug (set of bugs really) does not just affect setuid binaries, but is already being extended to create other artifacts. > In light of things like > https://github.com/0xdeadbeefnetwork/ssh-keysign-pwn and the general > attack surface of set-id, I'm considering changing Debian's OpenSSH > packaging to ship ssh-keysign non-setuid, and patching the > documentation to tell users that they need to make it setuid root > (using a Debian-specific tool that causes that kind of change to be > preserved across upgrades) if they want to use host-based > authentication. My sense is that host-based authentication is quite > niche these days and that it already involves a certain amount of > specialized setup anyway. > > As far as upgrade considerations go, ssh-keysign is client-side, so > there should be no risk of making people's machines inaccessible on > upgrade. We could possibly detect whether `EnableSSHKeysign yes` is > already set in the client configuration and preserve the setuid bit in > that case. > > Would the upstream developers have any objection to this > configuration? It would be a difference from what `make install` does > and it's possible that it might result in the odd stray support > request, so it seemed polite to check. > > Alternatively (or additionally), I'm considering splitting ssh-keysign > out to a separate `openssh-keysign` package, since most users don't > need to have it installed at all. > > It looks as though Fedora does both these things (a separate package, > and no setuid bit). They seem to have no documentation of how to make > ssh-keysign persistently setuid on systems that require it, at least > not in their packaging. > > Thanks, > > -- > Colin Watson (he/him) [[email protected]] > _______________________________________________ > openssh-unix-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev