Re: Call for testing: OpenSSH 10.4
Damien Miller <[email protected]> Sun, 5 Jul 2026 10:08:57 +1000 (AEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.openssh.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 4 Jul 2026, Felix Fehlauer wrote: > On 7/2/26 01:25, Damien Miller wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Jul 2026, Felix Fehlauer via openssh-unix-dev wrote: > > > [...] > > > > That might mean that something is already using port 3322 on your machine. > > > > Try changing the 'base=33' variable in regress/forwarding.sh to something > > else (e.g. try "94") and see if that helps. > > > > -d > > Sorry for the late reply. > > I cannot find anything running on port 3322, but indeed changing the base to > 94 makes the test pass. > > However, unless the tests are executed with the insecure LEGACY crypto policy, > they still fail with: Yes, we want to test rsa/sha1 if its available but Redhat doesn't seem to offer any clean way to detect it at runtme. Redhat's patch to sshd has it attempt an extra rsa/sha1 signature per connection because of a lack of a better way to do it. RSA signatures aren't super expensive, but this seems like a wasteful way to find out (effectively) whether a flag has been set. -d