Re: disabling local-to-local transfers?

Eloi Benoist-Vanderbeken <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm just saying that new options should not break old scripts. I also gave a reasonable example of such script. Instead of being unnecessarily dogmatic and refusing to discuss arguments that may seem relevant.

It is not a strong argument to add a new option to indicate a specific behaviour,
whan a sufficient option already exists which indicates exactly the same
specific behaviour.

> But feel free to continue your approach.

Don't do that here.

I believe this issue can now be put to rest.