Re: I need something like ssh -D, but http proxy, not socks

Darren Tucker <[email protected]> Thu, 04 Nov 2010 10:59:24 +1100
Newsgroups gmane.network.openssh.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 4/11/10 6:31 AM, Ilya Basin wrote:
> The SSH protocol itself supports names
> resolving on server (PuTTY is the proof), but ssh -D provides only
> socks4, which doesn't support names resolving on server.

That's not the case for OpenSSH; it's supported socks5 since 2003 (v3.7 
and up) and socks4a since January last year (v5.2 and up).  Both of 
those support resolving names on the server side if the socks client 
asks for it (eg in Firefox, about:config -> 
network.proxy.socks_remote_dns=true).

[1] http://anoncvs.mindrot.org/index.cgi/openssh/channels.c?annotate=1.169
[2] http://anoncvs.mindrot.org/index.cgi/openssh/channels.c?annotate=1.280

-- 
Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au)
GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4  37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69
     Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience
usually comes from bad judgement.