Re: [PATCH ovpn net v5 3/6] ovpn: initialize TCP state before registering UAPI
Ralf Lici <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.openvpn.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2026 13:04:37 +0200, Sabrina Dubroca <[email protected]> wrote: > 2026-07-06, 13:34:01 +0200, Ralf Lici wrote: > > ovpn_tcp_init initializes the TCP proto and proto_ops templates used > > when a TCP socket is attached to an ovpn peer but ovpn_init registers > > the rtnl link ops and generic netlink family before initializing those > > templates. Once either interface is visible, userspace can create an > > If only the rtnl part is registered, we can create a netdevice but not > attach a socket to it, so the ovpn_tcp_* ops should not be reachable. > Right, thanks for catching the imprecise wording. I'll reword the commit message to make that clear. > > ovpn device and configure a TCP socket while the TCP templates are still > > zero-initialized. > > > > Initialize the TCP templates before publishing the rtnl and netlink > > interfaces, so externally reachable setup paths can only observe > > initialized TCP state. > > > > Fixes: 11851cbd60ea ("ovpn: implement TCP transport") > > Signed-off-by: Ralf Lici <[email protected]> > > --- > > New patch added in v5. > > > > drivers/net/ovpn/main.c | 10 +++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ovpn/main.c b/drivers/net/ovpn/main.c > > index 9993c1dfe471..c2c3af0c3c55 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/ovpn/main.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/ovpn/main.c > > @@ -233,8 +233,14 @@ static struct rtnl_link_ops ovpn_link_ops = { > > > > static int __init ovpn_init(void) > > { > > - int err = rtnl_link_register(&ovpn_link_ops); > > + int err; > > > > + /* initialize the TCP protos before the module is exposed through rtnl > > + * or netlink > > + */ > > I don't think that comment adds much. The commit message explains why > this needs to be moved (and why this had to be moved, if someone > touches this later) > Agreed, I'll drop the comment. I added it as a warning for future changes, but the commit message and history should be enough context. -- Ralf Lici Mandelbit Srl