Re: [PATCH ovpn net v6 5/6] ovpn: run deferred work on a module-owned workqueue

Ralf Lici <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.openvpn.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
From: [email protected]

On Fri, 07 Aug 2026 08:36:20 +0200, Antonio Quartulli <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> On 29/07/2026 12:21, Ralf Lici wrote:
> > ovpn queues several work items whose callbacks execute module text.
> > These works currently run on the global system workqueues, so module
> > exit has no driver-owned drain point that guarantees the callbacks have
> > fully returned before the module text can be freed.
> > 
> > Object references protect the objects used by the callbacks, but they do
> > not prove that a workqueue function has returned. In particular, a
> > worker can drop the final reference that unblocks device teardown while
> > it is still executing ovpn code.
> > 
> > Add a module-owned workqueue and queue all ovpn work items on it. During
> > module exit, unregister rtnl and netlink first, flush the workqueue so
> > ordinary ovpn workers finish, run the final RCU barrier, and destroy the
> > workqueue last. This keeps the workqueue available for cleanup work
> > queued from RCU callbacks, while ensuring no ovpn work item can outlive
> > the module text.
> > 
> > The per-device delayed keepalive work remains explicitly disabled during
> > netdev teardown (disable_delayed_work_sync in ndo_uninit), since
> > flush_workqueue does not flush delayed work that is still only pending
> > on its timer.
> > 
> > Fixes: 3ecfd9349f40 ("ovpn: implement keepalive mechanism")
> > Fixes: 11851cbd60ea ("ovpn: implement TCP transport")
> > Signed-off-by: Ralf Lici <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Changes since v5 https://lore.kernel.org/openvpn-devel/d530ecfc3719845075fbddd0cd7c34752bc2ce16.1783336121.git.ralf@mandelbit.com/
> > - Update the module-exit ordering for the queue_rcu_work-based key-slot
> >    release: flush ordinary ovpn work before rcu_barrier, then destroy the
> >    workqueue after RCU callbacks have queued their cleanup work.
> > 
> > Changes since v4 https://lore.kernel.org/openvpn-devel/6edfcc51e0855bfd34286b86d4e7f26bb3bcd3f7.1783099626.git.ralf@mandelbit.com/
> > - Rebase on the pending keepalive and TCP deferred-work refcount fixes,
> >    preserving their hold-before-queue and queue-failure put handling when
> >    converting schedule_work to queue_work.
> > 
> > Changes since v3 https://lore.kernel.org/openvpn-devel/49f38f89340e18ed30543d3990a7a7e20595b6af.1783080055.git.ralf@mandelbit.com/
> > - Replace the RCU-deferred peer netdev reference release with a
> >    module-owned workqueue that drains all ovpn work callbacks before
> >    module text can be freed.
> > 
> >   drivers/net/ovpn/main.c     | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> >   drivers/net/ovpn/ovpnpriv.h |  4 ++++
> >   drivers/net/ovpn/peer.c     |  8 ++++----
> >   drivers/net/ovpn/tcp.c      |  9 ++++-----
> >   4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ovpn/main.c b/drivers/net/ovpn/main.c
> > index 5093a3b5aba6..80d10f9ef7d8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ovpn/main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ovpn/main.c
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> >   #include <linux/module.h>
> >   #include <linux/netdevice.h>
> >   #include <linux/inetdevice.h>
> > +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> >   #include <net/gro_cells.h>
> >   #include <net/ip.h>
> >   #include <net/rtnetlink.h>
> > @@ -26,6 +27,9 @@
> >   #include "tcp.h"
> >   #include "udp.h"
> >   
> > +/* module-owned workqueue on which all ovpn-specific work is queued */
> > +struct workqueue_struct *ovpn_wq;
> > +
> >   static void ovpn_priv_free(struct net_device *net)
> >   {
> >   	struct ovpn_priv *ovpn = netdev_priv(net);
> > @@ -237,10 +241,16 @@ static int __init ovpn_init(void)
> >   
> >   	ovpn_tcp_init();
> >   
> > +	ovpn_wq = alloc_workqueue("ovpn", 0, 0);
>
> This is triggering:
>
>
> workqueue: ovpn is using neither WQ_PERCPU or WQ_UNBOUND. Setting WQ_PERCPU.
> WARNING: kernel/workqueue.c:5852 at __alloc_workqueue+0x1cf5/0x2060, 
> CPU#0: swapper/0/1
>
>
> Can you fix it and resend this patch only please?
>

Sure. Apparently the development tree used for this series predated
commit 21c05ca88a54 ("workqueue: Add warnings and ensure one among
WQ_PERCPU or WQ_UNBOUND is present"), which now warns when the selection
is implicit.

I'll resend this patch, explicitly selecting WQ_PERCPU to preserve the
existing workqueue behavior.

>
> Regards,
>

Regards,

-- 
Ralf Lici
Mandelbit Srl
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.