Re: MSCHAPv2 traffic should be considered unencrypted

Tim Gustafson <[email protected]> Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:25:24 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.network.poptop,gmane.comp.misc.pptpclient.devel
Message-ID <CAG27QgSOSeE=AEUCWZpSSYgGwKT43kh6J9ReJ8qE0gUxNVyPbA@mail.gmail.com>
> But I've always found OpenVPN to be easy to configure.  There exist
> many clients pushed by the VPN provider market.  A list here:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenVPN#Client_software

And, as far as mobile devices go, all of those options require rooting
your phone.

The reason that PPTP is so nice is that pretty much EVERY device
supports it out-of-the-box.  That's a big deal for me.  My department
alone supports something like 500 active users, and the University as
a whole supports something like 30,000.  There's no way we're going to
convince all those people to root their phones, and even if we could I
wouldn't want to support all those clients after the fact - as soon as
we do something like that, everything that ever goes wrong with that
device again is "our fault" in our client's eyes.

As I understand it, most devices also support L2TP, but from what I
can tell that requires setting up a PKI and that is also just not
feasible.  Users know how to authenticate with their login names and
passwords.  The argument against this authentication model in the
documents I've read related to this MSCHAPv2 insecurity discussion is
that people pick easy-to-guess passwords.  That may be so, but
requiring users to use certificates for VPN connections when we don't
require them to use certificates for HTTPS or SSH connections is
seriously missing the point.  If an attacker can just bypass the VPN
and connect via HTTPS or SSH directly with a login name and password,
then there is no reason to require certificate authentication for VPN
connections.

Also, I think we should change the title of this thread to "MSCHAPv2
traffic should be considered unencrypted", so I have done so in this
reply.

And, it's worth nothing that this strongly suggests that WPA and WPA2
authentication models are also equally insecure, as those both rely on
MSCHAPv2 as well.

-- 

Tim Gustafson
[email protected]
831-459-5354
Baskin Engineering, Room 313A

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/