Re: Help with troubleshooting performance issue
James Cameron <[email protected]> Tue, 2 Apr 2013 16:13:31 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.poptop |
|---|---|
| Organization | Netrek Vanilla Server Dictator |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 04:01:05PM +1100, Jafaruddin Lie wrote: > Thanks, James. > I am doing a lab comparing pptp performance and ipsec vpn > performance, so this is not really for production :) Doesn't seem interesting. ipsec is entirely kernel based, so you will see a performance improvement purely based on scheduling. > I did tcpdump on the pptp server, I am seeing a few [TCP Previous > Segment not captured] and [TCP ACKed unseen segment]. > Not sure what that means though. Means the throughput degradation is due to missing packets. > The machines are older machines, but they are dual-core machines. > Assuming everything is optimised, are you saying that pptp might not > be able to sustain more than around 6-8MBps traffic? It depends on the CPU performance, the type of memory, the kernel version, and the amount of contention among user-space processes. What contention do you observe? (uptime, load averages). But yes, I would not be surprised if on a typical pair of machines that PPTP might sustain a bandwidth of more than a tenth of native link bandwidth. You might isolate the problem further by testing a client or server using another operating system. There has been a kernel based PPTP implementation, but not in the CentOS packaging. You would probably need to patch and rebuild the kernel in order to try that. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Own the Future-Intel(R) Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013 Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/12124-176961-30367-2