Re: [Proftpd-user] SElinux question on 1.3.6
Philip Prindeville <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.proftpd.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Nov 15, 2017, at 3:33 PM, TJ Saunders <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>>> and assuming that includes reboots, which implies that it can’t be /run >>>> since that’s a tmpfs on Fedora. >>> >>> If the DelayTable is on ephemeral storage like tmpfs, it is not >>> necessarily an error/failure. mod_delay will simply recreate and >>> repopulate the table, on startup, when it is not there. I'll update the >>> mod_delay docs to call this out. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> TJ >> >> >> So having it be on /run has no downside except forgetting about delays >> (possibly LONG delays, like 30 days) across reboots? > > No, there is a cap on the selected delay; see: > > https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/blob/master/modules/mod_delay.c#L89 > > Cheers, > TJ Hmm... uint64_t is your friend. Okay, thanks for the explanation. -Philip ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ ProFTPD Users List <[email protected]> Unsubscribe problems? http://www.proftpd.org/list-unsub.html