Re: [Proftpd-user] RLimitMemory question
Ian via Proftp-user <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.proftpd.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Bob, Thanks for the reply. > Virtual memory is "virtual" (just a number!) and thus it does not necessarily consume any RAM. This makes sense since we haven't seen a linear increase in the total Virtual RAM consumption as we scale up more connections, but do see increases of ~ 8K per additional connection. > It may be that the RLimitMemory feature is not very effective since it is based on virtual memory (address space) rather than the actual memory used. The directive name + the documentation is a bit vague so it could be misleading. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ ProFTPD Users List <[email protected]> Unsubscribe problems? http://www.proftpd.org/list-unsub.html