[quagga-users 14690] Re: IPv6 BGP routes from a directly connected peer are not accepted in the routing table
Alarig Le Lay <[email protected]> Wed, 17 May 2017 17:38:37 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.quagga.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On mer. 17 mai 17:46:46 2017, Dimitris Kalogeras wrote: > router bgp 65010 > bgp router-id 1.1.1.1 > neighbor fc80:3::2 remote-as 65020 > ! neighbor fc80:3::2 soft-reconfiguration inbound > ! > address-family ipv6 > network fc80:1::/64 > neighbor fc80:3::2 activate > ! neighbor fc80:3::2 soft-reconfiguration inbound > exit-address-family > exit Hi, I activate the IPv6 neighbors in the address-family context, but configuring it in the normal context: router bgp 204092 bgp router-id 193.200.42.229 neighbor 130.117.20.2 remote-as 174 neighbor 130.117.20.2 password <blah> neighbor 130.117.20.2 ebgp-multihop 15 neighbor 2001:550:0:1000::8275:1402 remote-as 174 neighbor 2001:550:0:1000::8275:1402 password <blah> neighbor 2001:550:0:1000::8275:1402 ebgp-multihop 15 no neighbor 2001:550:0:1000::8275:1402 activate ! address-family ipv6 neighbor 2001:550:0:1000::8275:1402 activate exit-address-family I don’t export routes to kernel as it is a blackholing session, but you can try something like that. -- alarig _______________________________________________ Quagga-users mailing list Quagga-users-UOy77sIEA+cAd7ICUelF/[email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE+2yGwT0H0n57WkRbrzhKwWsgK4gFAlkcbnoACgkQrzhKwWsg K4iDeAf/cd5uG1hzpSCJyEBFPGq2jbayYkkDKdbomSKuHSVlWSqCAXIrghcgzKO5 4v0Xo6q3nA+oKN4mfI0D9Ks/SxrQY282kRmTJmP1X1oJbwRbK/IA81tHGO5/7Mwx UYMj3at3P+AcZNn3Pe8jiNp/s40lolQElFUVQCBz6N0XnTFOyfGsZrXHqoQ04aI5 gFcV0J8O9isz8nUAIY3YgjxFqDAADq16w/FwiDJuLEapMhMml599NAGMrg0q/je9 ZIS71NzGappzmOXqyDrw4Ixg5czQm4tO7KE0LukNEQ5HY20bngJx2DO098hrk5mW gDGaXAHjQCk8o09x9hxrtBYLv2pDHw== =koJM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----